检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田引安[1]
机构地区:[1]中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司,西安710043
出 处:《铁道标准设计》2015年第2期43-49,共7页Railway Standard Design
摘 要:结合斯里兰卡南部高速公路设计实例,阐述中国及澳大利亚两国规范关于公路几何设计指标选取的异同。通过对公路基本标准、平曲线半径、超高、加宽、缓和曲线、纵断面纵坡、竖曲线以及线形组合设计的对比研究表明:澳洲规范对于净空和视距要求高,竖曲线最小半径较大,其余指标限值比我国有不同程度降低。差异的主要原因是客观环境下参数取值以及设计理念、方法有别,相对于我国规范严谨性和操作性强的特点,澳洲规范总体要求比较灵活和宽松,设计者可有更大的发挥空间。Based on the case of the design of Southern Expressway in Sri Lanka, the similarities and differences in the application of geometric design specifications between China and Australia are stated. The comparison and analysis of basic criteria, horizontal curve radius, superelevation, pavement widening, vertical gradient, vertical curve and alignment coordination involved in highway design indicate that the requirements for clearance and sight distance are higher and the minimum radius of vertical curve is bigger as stipulated by Australia, but the others are lower comparatively. The differences lie in the selection of parameters under the objective environments and design concepts and approaches. Compared with the addresses of Chinese standards in strictness and practicability, Australian standard is more flexible to grant designers with more space for design.
分 类 号:U412[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170