检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:石良瑜
出 处:《数理医药学杂志》2015年第2期274-275,共2页Journal of Mathematical Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨使用不同诊断技术对患者膝关节骨关节炎的对比效果,以评价低磁场共振在诊断中的价值。方法:对膝关节骨关节炎的50例患者进行两种检测方法诊断,分别命名为低磁场共振组和关节镜组,其中关节镜组进行关节镜检查,低磁场共振组使用低磁场共振技术,分别记录使用不同诊断方法检查后,患者的检出率和有效率。结果:采用低磁场共振诊断的患者,检出率和有效率均要高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:低磁场共振诊断后患者的临床效果要好于对照组,精确度高,检出率和有效率均有临床价值,具有巨大临床推广意义。Objective: To investigate the effect of different diagnostic techniques on knee osteoarthritis and e-valuate the value of low field MRI to diagnisis.Methods: Diagnose 50 cases of knee osteoarthritis with two detection methods and name them low field MRI group and arthroscope group respectively. Detect the arthroscope group with arthroscope and low field MRI group with low field MRI. Record the detection rate and effective rate of patients in both groups respectively after detection. Results: Detection rate and effective rate of the group which applied the technique of low field MRI are higher than that of the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion:It is more effective to di-agnose patients with low field MRI and more accurate than with arthroscope group. The detection rate and effective rate are clinically significant ,it is woth of great clinical promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28