法释义学视角下合同法定解除的损害赔偿  

Damage compensation for contract rescission from the perspective of law interpretation

作　　者：许中缘[1] 耿真 雷艳平[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410083 [2]湖南大学法学院,湖南长沙410082

出　　处：《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第1期73-80,共8页Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目"法学方法论与中国民商法研究"(13&ZD150);湖南省社科基金"共同法律行为与我国民法典(13YBA332)"

摘　　要：合同解除与违约损害赔偿的关系经历了从择一主义到并用主义转变的历史进程。合同解除与合同终止是两个不同的概念。而合同法定解除实质上是违约责任,其性质是请求权而非形成权。我国合同法定解除后的损害赔偿请求权基础为因债务不履行所生的对履行利益的损害赔偿请求权,而非合同因法定解除而生的对信赖利益的损害赔偿请求权。关于合同法定解除后的溯及力,应采德国通说即清算关系说。The relationship between contract rescission and damages for a breach of the contract has experienced a historical progression from alternative to socialism. The rescission of the contract and the termination of the contract are different concepts. Essentially speaking, contract rescission is a breach of contract, whose essence should be a right of claim rather then that of formation. The basis for claim compensation for damage on termination of the contract is the claim compensation for damage of the benefit based on the non-performance of the debt rather than based on the rescission of the contract. On the retroactivity of termination of the contract, we should adopt the general view of the German, that is, the relationship theory of liquidation.

关 键 词：法定解除 损害赔偿 清算关系 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]