检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京外国语大学中国外语教育研究中心,北京100089 [2]湖南商学院外国语学院,湖南长沙410205
出 处:《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第1期251-256,共6页Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"二语特征组装模式下的英语导句功能语类习得研究"(12BYY118);湖南省社会科学基金项目"生成语法语用能力研究"(13YBA408)
摘 要:特征重组假说是目前二语习得研究应用原则与参数框架实现既定理论目标的有效尝试,在学界引发了不少争议。该假说将二语习得设想为习得者通过对比分析母语与二语特征之间的对应之处,拆分(delink)母语特征并将其按二语要求重装(reassemble)于二语词项之上,必要时辅以普遍语法特征库的完全通达以补全母语中缺失的特征,完成后续句法习得。但是,不支持宏观语法参数与Borer-Chomsky微观词汇参数,以及特征识别时不区分可解读、不可解读特征等观点引起学界质疑其可行性。Feature Re-assembly Hypothesis is an efficient attempt to instantiate theoretical goals within the Principlesand Parameters framework in the current second language acquisition (SLA) research, causing quite a few debates inSLA research field. It assumes that L2 learners acquire target languages by finding the corresponding features betweenL1 and L2 via contrastive analysis, delinking L1 features and reassembling them into L2 lexical items according to therequirements of L2, assisting with full access to UG inventory of features to supply the features nonexistent in L1 ifnecessary, so as to accomplish subsequent syntactic acquisition. Yet, some assumptions are questioned by L2researchers, including the issues of nonsupport of macro-parameter and Borer-Chomsky Conjecture (micro-parameter),and no distinction between interpretable and uninterpretable features in feature recognition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28