检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王晓晖[1]
机构地区:[1]广东财经大学经济贸易学院,广东广州510320
出 处:《广东财经大学学报》2015年第1期52-59,共8页Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJC790150);国家社会科学基金青年项目(12CJY006)
摘 要:在对证券投资基金行业配置效率进行测量的基础上,实证研究了基金行业配置效率对基金业绩的贡献程度。结果显示,在整个样本区间,行业配置效率对基金投资业绩的贡献程度仅在3%左右;在不同市场周期(牛市、熊市和震荡市),虽然牛市期间行业配置效率对基金业绩的贡献度相对较高,但基于各市场期间所统计的贡献度仍极为有限。实证结论不仅对优化行业配置能显著提升基金业绩的主观假设提出了质疑,也为重新认识两者间的关系提供了实证支持。Based on the measuring of mutual funds' industry distribution efficiency, the research empirically measures the impact of industry distribution efficiency on fund investment performance. The results show that the contribution degree of industry distribution efficiency of funds to fund performance reaches just about 3 % in the whole samples. In different market periods (bull market, bear market and concussion market) , the contribution degree of industry distribution efficiency to fund performance is comparatively higher in the bull market period, but the contribution degrees calculated based on all the market periods are still limited. The conclusion not only challenges the assumption that the optimization of industry distribution efficiency can improve fund performance, but also provides an empirical support for rethinking the relationship between industry distribution efficiency and fund performance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.36.171