检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈佛大学政府系 [2]清华大学教育研究院
出 处:《清华大学教育研究》2015年第1期1-5,共5页Tsinghua Journal of Education
摘 要:当下的教育全球化与近代教会大学有相似之处,即存在着大量的学术竞争。由于缺乏明确的学术评价标准,学术竞争并不一定带来学术增长,反而可能导致资源浪费以及冲突。本文以早期的齐鲁大学和哈佛燕京学社和目前的北大燕京学堂为例,进行了相关分析,指出学术标准的重要性、多样性是高等教育系统持续发展的保障。The current globalization made trade and higher education increasingly interconnected. This trend is more visible than in China. The business models of globalized higher education are in many respects far removed from the Christian Colleges of Republican China. Despite the very different motives, mechanisms and scale, there are some instructive parallels. Both endeavors raise profound questions about the intent and outcome of academic competition. Without meaningful standards of scholarly and pedagogical excellence, competition in the realm of higher education may lead to wasted resources and even conflict, rather than to the advance of either global citizenship or global knowledge. In the frenetic race to ascend in the academic rankings, we run the risk of compromising the intellectual and institutional diversity and vitality, which is our best guarantee of a successful and sustainable system of higher education.
关 键 词:教育全球化 哈佛燕京学社 齐鲁大学 燕京学堂 学术竞争 学术标准
分 类 号:G640[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7