机构地区:[1]杭州市第七人民医院,杭州310013 [2]甘肃省中医院,兰州730000
出 处:《中国现代应用药学》2015年第1期17-22,共6页Chinese Journal of Modern Applied Pharmacy
基 金:杭州市科技发展计划项目(20110833B21);浙江省中医药科学研究基金项目(2011ZB112);杭州市卫生科技计划(一般)项目(2012A039);浙江省中医药科技计划项目(20122B134)
摘 要:目的探讨二甲双胍防治抗精神病药舒必利、利培酮所致的大鼠体质量增加、糖脂代谢紊乱及肝脏脂质沉着的效果。方法大鼠第1~4天予舒必利25 mg·kg-1·d-1或利培酮0.05 mg·kg-1·d-1灌胃,从第5日起舒必利加至50 mg·kg-1·d-1或利培酮加至0.1 mg·kg-1·d-1,2周后加用二甲双胍100 mg·kg-1·d-1,总共给药周期为8周;取基线,3 d,1周,2周,4周,6周,8周7个时间点,称取大鼠体质量,测空腹血糖(fasting blood-glucose,FBS)及餐后2 h血糖(2-hour post-meal blood glucose,2h PBG);于实验第8周末检测血清果糖胺(fructosamine,FA)、胰岛素(insulin,IRS)水平血清胆固醇(total cholesterol,TC)、甘油三酯(triglyceride,TG)、低密度脂蛋白(low density lipoprotein cholesterol,LDL-C)及高密度脂蛋白(high density lipoprotein cholesterol,HDL-C),并取大鼠肝脏进行常规HE染色。结果各时间点二甲双胍组与正常对照组各相关指标差异无统计学意义;与正常对照组比较,服用舒必利组、利培酮组大鼠在第6周、8周末体质量、2h PBG、INS、FA升高(P〈0.05),8周末TC、TG、HDL-C升高(P〈0.05),LDL-C降低(P〈0.05),而舒必利与利培酮组比较,上述指标差异无统计学意义;舒必利或利培酮合用二甲双胍的大鼠6周及8周末体质量、2h PBG、INS、FA较单独使用舒必利或利培酮的大鼠更低(P〈0.05),8周末TC、TG、HDL-C更低(P〈0.05),LDL-C较高(P〈0.05)。肝脏病理示舒必利及利培酮组大鼠肝细胞形态紊乱,血管周围见多量白色脂肪浸润细胞,且在距离血管较远的肝细胞也可见到脂质沉着;舒必利或利培酮合用二甲双胍的大鼠肝细胞形态整齐,血管周围及血管较远白色脂肪浸润细胞明显少于舒必利及利培酮组。结论抗精神病药舒必利、利培酮可引起大鼠体质量增加、血糖升高、糖耐量异常、脂代谢紊乱及肝脏脂质沉着,二甲双胍能有效地防治舒必利、利培酮所致OBJECTIVE To study using metformin to prevent and treat body weight increasing, sugar lipid metabolic disorder and liver lipid deposition which are caused by sulpiride or risperidone in rats. METHODS From 1 d to 4 d, sulpiride 25 mg·kg-1·d-1 or isperidone 0.05 mg·kg-1·d-1 was gavaged; and from the 5th day, sulpiride 50 mg·kg-1·d-1 or isperidone 0.1 mg·kg-1·d-1 was gavaged; from 15 th day, metformin 100 mg·kg-1·d-1 was added. The total period of dosing was 8 weeks. weight, fasting blood sugar(FBS) and postprandial 2 hours blood glucose(2h PBG) were measured at inbaseline, 3 d, 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th and 8th week. At the end of 8th week, serum cholesterol(TC), triglyceride(TG), low density lipoprotein(LDL-C), high density lipoprotein(HDL-C), fructosamine(FA) and insulin(IRS) were measured, and HE staining in rat livers. RESULTS Compared with normal control group, all the indicators in metformin group had no significant statistical difference. At 6th and 8th week, rats weight, 2h PBG, INS and FA in sulpiride group or risperidone group were higher than normal control group(P〈0.05), rat weight, 2 HPBG, INS and FA in sulpiride+metformin group or rispidone+metformin group were lower than sulpiride group or rispidone group(P〈0.05). At the end of 8th week, TC, TG and HDL-C in sulpiride group or risperidone group were higher than normal control group(P〈0.05), LDL-C was lower(P〈0.05); TC, TG and HDL-C in sulpiride+metformin group or risperidone+metformin group were lower than sulpiride and risperidone group(P〈0.05), LDL-C were higher(P〈0.05). Liver HE staining pathologic examination showed that compared with normal control group, rat liver cells in sulpiride group and risperidone group arrangement were not neat, around the small blood vessels, there were more white fat cells and hepatocellular lipid calm far away from the blood vessels; sulpiride+metformin group and risperidone+metformin group had normal liver cells, there were moderate wh
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...