经学、经世之学、新史学与营造学和建筑史学——现代中国建筑史学的形成再思  

Old in New Reflections on the Influence of the Traditional Study of Classics,Ming and Qing Pragmatism,and Late Qing New History on the Historiography of Chinese Architecture

作　　者：赖德霖 

机构地区：[1]美国路易维尔大学美术系

出　　处：《建筑学报》2014年第9期108-116,共9页Architectural Journal

摘　　要：针对目前有关中国建筑史学史的研究多强调西方建筑学术和历史观念的影响,即现代性,而对传统学术的影响和价值则有欠重视的现状,文章拟在20世纪中国传统学术现代转型的脉络中重新审视中国建筑史学的形成,一为揭示传统学术在这项研究中的表现和影响,二为认识乐嘉藻、朱启钤、梁思成、刘敦桢和林徽因等先驱的成就提供新的视角,三为促进学界进一步思考先驱们当年曾经面对的问题,从而在寻求现代建筑的中国特色的同时,发现传统建筑史论述中可资借鉴的中国性。The development of the historiography of Chinese architecture has involved the exchange of ideas and methodologies between the Chinese and the foreign scholarship as well as the old and the new. While most current studies have convincingly uncovered Western and Japanese impacts in the investigation and writing of Chinese architecture since the early twentieth century, few of them have paid enough attention to the traditional scholarship on architecture. This paper studies the formation of the historiography of Chinese architecture in relationship to the modern transformation of the traditional Chinese study of history. In this context, this paper reevaluates the contributions of some pioneer scholars. It also invites its readers to consider how we, in searching for characteristics of Chinese architecture, can benefit from historical accounts that stood for traditional understandings of “architecture.”

关 键 词：中国建筑史学史 乐嘉藻 朱启钤 梁思成 刘敦桢 林徽因 

分 类 号：TU-092[建筑科学—建筑理论]