检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]郑州市第一人民医院儿科,河南郑州450000
出 处:《中国医药科学》2014年第24期57-58,72,共3页China Medicine And Pharmacy
摘 要:目的对比枸橼酸咖啡因与氨茶碱治疗早产儿原发性呼吸暂停的疗效。方法原发性早产儿呼吸暂停患儿59例,随机分为咖啡因组32例和氨茶碱组27例。对比两组患儿治疗总有效率及呼吸暂停终止时间。结果咖啡因组总有效率明显高于氨茶碱组(87.5%vs 63.0%,x2=6.408,P=0.041),咖啡因组呼吸暂停终止时间明显短于氨茶碱组[(2.9±1.2)d vs(3.5±1.0)d,t=-2.063,P=0.044]。结论咖啡因治疗早产儿呼吸暂停疗效优于氨茶碱。Objective To compare the effect of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treatment of primary apnea of prematurity. Methods 59 cases of preterm infant with primary apnea were divided into two groups, the group treated by caffeine citrate(32 cases) and the group treated by aminophylline(27 cases). To compare the efficiency and apnea termination time between two groups. Results Compared with the aminophylline group, the total effective rate of the caffeine group was higher(87.5%vs 63%, χ2=6.408, P=0.041), and the apnea termination time was shorter[(2.9±1.2)d vs (3.5±1.0)d, t=-2.063, P=0.044]. Conclusion Caffeine citrate is more effective than aminophylline in treatment of primary apnea of prematurity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117