检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙伟峰[1]
出 处:《湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第6期105-109,共5页Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社科基金青年项目(14CFX028)
摘 要:实行法庭主审法官办案责任制是确保"让审理者裁判,由裁判者负责"的有益探索,有助于解决司法行政化、司法责任的承担和办案质效低的问题。目前基层法庭主审法官办案责任制试点还存在办案机制亟待进一步细化和规范、主审法官独任案件范围亟待明确、办案责任的内部监督和惩戒存在缺失、办案责任的保障机制有待健全等现实困扰,亟待在主审法官办案机制、裁判案件范围、内部监督和保障制度上多管齐下,辩证施治。The implementation of the responsibility system of the trial judge in the grass-roots tribunal is good for exploration of “the inquisitor to do the judge, the judge to response”, useful for solving the problems of the administration of justice, the judicial responsibility undertaken, and the low efficiency of case handling quality and efficiency. At present, there are many real troubles in the pilot of the responsibility :system of the trial judge in the grassroots tribunal, such as, lack of elaboration and specification of the handling mechanism of inquisitor, the ambiguity of sole case's scope, deletion of internal supervision and disciplinary, and the infirmity of the security system. In order to solve these problems existing in the handling mechanism of the inquisitor, the scope of cases, the internal supervision and the security system, we need dialectical implementation and administration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229