检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大连海事大学法学院,辽宁大连116026 [2]华东政法大学科学研究院,上海200042
出 处:《中国海商法研究》2014年第4期67-72,108,共7页Chinese Journal of Maritime Law
摘 要:《中华人民共和国海事诉讼法》及其司法解释中有关船舶司法拍卖的规定过于原则,导致在实务中需要同时适用《最高人民法院关于人民法院民事执行中拍卖、变卖财产的规定》等规范作为补充。但船舶司法拍卖程序具有特殊性,一般民事规范中的程序性规定难以与其兼容,在适用之时显现诸多法律冲突。例如《中华人民共和国海事诉讼法》与最高人民法院司法解释有关规定的冲突、《中华人民共和国海事诉讼法》与《中华人民共和国企业破产法》有关规定的冲突等。在总结分析近年来我国船舶拍卖司法实务的基础上,揭示此类相关规范之间的冲突,并为船舶拍卖法律规范的协调、完善提供参考性建议。The provisions in Special Maritime Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China as well as its judicial interpretations in relation to ship' s judicial sale are very broad. Accordingly, in legal practice, the courts have to apply other laws and judicial interpretations as supplements. On account of the specialty of ship' s judicial sale, these laws and regulations are hard to be harmonious with each other. For example, there are conflicts in provisions between Special Maritime Procedure Law of the People' s Republic of China and judicial interpretations of the Supreme People' s Court, also between Special Mari- time Procedure Law of the People' s Republic of China and Enterprise Bankruptcy Law of the People' s Republic of China. This paper summarizes and analyses the legal practice of ship' s judicial sale in China during recent years, probes into conflicts between relevant laws and regulations, and aims to find out referential way for solutions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.212.222