国家、政党与宪法:政治妥协的现实制度框架  

Nation,Political Parties and the Constitution:Institutional Framework of Political Compromise

作　　者：陶庆[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学法政学院

出　　处：《学术前沿》2014年第23期68-80,共13页Frontiers

基　　金：2011年教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助"项目阶段性成果;项目编号:NCET-11-0621;2011年度教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目阶段性成果;项目编号:11JJD810018

摘　　要：由于中国政治现代化属于后发外生型,立宪框架下实现政治妥协就多少折射出政党特别是执政党的政治化光谱。在当下中国立宪体系与政党执政等国家主权"双轴体系"的现实政治生活中,一方面坚持依宪治国的法治原则毫不动摇,另一方面依托中国共产党的执政权绝不懈怠,把日益涌现的既定宪法无法有效化解的大量非制度性利益表达与政治参与等社会矛盾甚至政治冲突,纳入到以协商民主为基调的"正当妥协"范畴下解决,逐步实现更加充分有效的政治妥协,并在条件成熟时通过修定宪法与废立有关政策规定,切实实现符合中国国情的法治目标。As China＇s political modernization takes a latecomer and exogenous road, the spectrum of political parties, especially of the ruling party, is to some extent reflected in the efforts to reach political compromise under the constitutional framework. In contemporary China, the political life features a ＂biaxial system＂ of national sovereignty in the constitutional system and the governance by the ruling party. On one hand, the government needs to unswervingly adhere to the legal principle of governing the country in accordance with the Constitution; on the other hand, it should never slacken its efforts to rely on the right of the CPC to run the country; incorporate into the ＂legitimate compromise＂ framework based on consultative democracy the increasing number of social conflicts and even political disputes such as non-institutional interest articulation and political participation that cannot be effectively resolved according to the existing Constitution, and then get them resolved; gradually realize a fuller and more effective political compromise; and amend the Constitution and abolish or make relevant policies and regulations when the conditions are ripe, so as to attain the goal of the rule of law that is in line with China＇s national conditions.

关 键 词：政治妥协 正当妥协 政党执政 法治国家 

分 类 号：D60[政治法律—政治学]