检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东北师范大学外国语学院,吉林长春130024 [2]斯坦林布什大学外语系
出 处:《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年第1期182-186,共5页Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学规划基金一般项目(12YJA740050)
摘 要:在批评性话语分析的讨论中存在理论概念模糊和混同问题,究其原因:脱离批评性话语分析产生的社会文化背景,把"话语"理解为传统语篇分析中的"语篇",从而忽视了批评话语分析的目的。批评性话语分析与其他语篇分析模式不同,不局限于对语篇的描写和阐释,而是深入剖析制约话语的意识形态和社会政治语境,挖掘被现实话语所掩饰的或人们习以为常的意识形态和权势关系,从而帮助人们重新认识社会结构和权力关系,这种研究对语言教育也具有重要启示意义。Recently CDA has aroused the interest of Chinese scholars who have discussed CDA both as a theory and research method, and have done some empirical studies on newspaper reports. While welcoming the new approach to discourse analysis in the Chinese context, we find that in these studies there is some misunderstanding of the basic theoretical concepts of CDA such as text,discourse,ideology and critical analysis. Therefore,in this paper,we first point out some problems in the CDA research in China, and describe the sociocultural context where CDA was initiated with the focus on its research purpose. After that, we discuss the basic concepts of CDA and their relations in order to show the differences between CDA and DA in terms of definitions, research purpose and significance. Finally, implications and suggestions are made to do CDA in the language education context.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.220.204.192