检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]长江勘测规划设计研究有限责任公司,湖北武汉430010 [2]中国电力工程顾问集团西北电力设计院,陕西西安710075
出 处:《人民长江》2015年第1期74-77,共4页Yangtze River
摘 要:随着我国环境影响评价制度的逐步实施,越来越多的防洪护岸工程实施了环境影响评价制度,对于实施过程中出现的问题,值得研究和探讨。以彭水县靛水新城乌江滨江段防洪护岸综合治理工程为例,分析对比了世界银行和我国对防洪护岸工程环境影响评价的要求和做法。分析结果表明,两者的主要内容相似,但在深度和关注点上存在一些差异,世行的环评要求更细致、深入,更注重项目替代方案及人文关怀,我国环评工作应参考和借鉴世行的要求,进一步加以改进。With more and more flood control and bank protection projects constructed and the enforcement of environmental im-pact assessment system in China, the environmental impact assessment of flood control and bank protection projects was devel-oped continuously and several problems was worthy discussing. Based on a case of flood control and bank protection project by Wujiang River in Dianshui New City, Pengshui County, the characteristics and requirements of environmental impact assessment proposed by China and the World Bank were analyzed and compared. The main contents of both standards were similar, but some differences existed. The World Bank system was deeper and more careful, in which the alternative program and human care were focused more.
关 键 词:环境影响评价 防洪护岸工程 世界银行 累积环境影响 彭水县
分 类 号:X82[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.176.192