“桥”式修补术治疗阴道前壁膨出的疗效分析  

Clinical survey of bridge repair of prolapse vaginae anterior

作　　者：李文娟[1] 郑荦[1] 王娜[2] 

机构地区：[1]沈阳,辽宁省人民医院妇产科,辽宁沈阳110016 [2]辽宁省人民医院药学部,辽宁沈阳110016

出　　处：《中国美容整形外科杂志》2015年第1期40-43,共4页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery

摘　　要：目的 探讨阴道前壁“桥”式缝合术治疗阴道前壁脱垂的疗效.方法 回顾性分析自2007年7月至2013年5月,采用手术治疗阴道前壁脱垂58例患者的临床资料,其中阴道前壁“桥”式缝合术30例,传统的阴道前壁修补术28例;比较两种术式的近期疗效.结果 阴道前壁“桥”式缝合术的手术时间为（21.50±3.80） min,术中出血量为（30.00 ±3.20）ml,术后复发率为3.33％,与传统术式的手术时间（48.50±3.50） min、术中出血量（74.00±5.60） ml、术后复发率14.29％进行比较,其差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.结论 与传统术式比较,“桥”式缝合术治疗阴道前壁脱垂的手术时间短,术中出血少,术后复发率低,近期疗效满意.Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect of bridge repair of prolapse vaginae anterior. Methods A retrospective study was performed on 58 patients with prolapse vaginae anterior who were treated by operations from July 2007 to May 2013, 30 of 58 patients received bridge repair and 28 patients performed the traditional anterior colporrhaphy. The short-term effects were compared between the two groups. Results The surgical time of traditional anterior colporrhaphy was （48.50±3.50） rain , the blood lose was （74.00 ±5.60） ml. The recurrenct rate was 14.29%. The surgical time of bridge repair was （21.50 ±3.80） rain, the blood lose was （30.00 ± 3.20） ml. The recurrenct rate was 3.33%. Compared with traditional method significant differences existed in the three aspects （ P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion The bridge repair of prolapse vaginae anterior is satisfied in surgical time, blood lose, recurrenct rate and short term effect when compared with the traditional surgical method.

关 键 词：阴道前壁脱垂 阴道前壁桥式缝合术 阴道前壁修补术 

分 类 号：R713.3[医药卫生—妇产科学]