检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨平[1,2] 蔡丽飞[1,2] 马鑫鑫[1,2] 曹学军[1,2]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学康复医学院,北京市100068 [2]中国康复研究中心康复工程研究所,北京市100068
出 处:《中国康复理论与实践》2014年第12期1192-1193,共2页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
摘 要:目的比较全骨盆切除者使用不同代步工具的能量消耗。方法对1例中年男性全骨盆切除者使用4种代步工具(接受腔、代步车、轮椅、假肢)时,进行运动心肺功能测试。结果患者使用假肢的移动速度最慢,轮椅最快;使用假肢的心率最高,代步车最低;使用接受腔进行手支撑行走的绝对耗氧量、相对耗氧量和代谢当量均最大,代步车最小。结论使用接受腔进行手支撑行走的能量消耗最大,其次分别为假肢、轮椅、代步车。Objective To compare the energy expenditure of a hemicorporectomy amputee moving with different mobility devices.Methods A middle-aged male hemicorporectomy amputee was measured with cardiopulmonary exercise test when moving with 4 kinds of transport: socket, cart, wheelchair, and prosthesis. Results The patient moved the slowest with prosthesis, fastest with wheelchair. The heart rate was the highest with prosthesis and lowest with cart. The absolute oxygen consumption, the relative volume of oxygen consumption and metabolic(Mets) were the most when hand walking with socket, and lowest with cart. Conclusion Hand walking with socket costs the largest energy when walking, and the rest are prosthesis, wheelchair, and cart.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3