检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]电子工程学院软件测评中心 [2]解放军77108部队
出 处:《现代雷达》2015年第2期79-82,共4页Modern Radar
摘 要:雷达干扰无人机典型压制干扰航路主要有跑道形和"8"字形两种。文中分别建立了两种典型航路的数学模型,利用航路偏离代价,分别对两种典型航路的持久干扰扇面进行研究,分析了航路偏离代价与干扰距离关系、航路偏离代价与航路纵向长度关系。计算结果表明:采用"8"字形航路飞行的雷达干扰无人机航路偏离代价较小,对雷达形成的持久干扰扇面大于采用跑道形航路飞行的雷达干扰无人机,并求解给出了采用"8"字形航路飞行的雷达干扰无人机最佳航路纵向长度与干扰距离关系。Runway-shaped and "8"-shaped paths are two typical oppressive jamming paths of radar jamming UAV. Models of two typical paths are established first. By using path deviate cost, the enduring jamming coverings of fan are researched respectively. The connections between the path deviate cost and jamming distance, path longitudinal length are analyzed. The results show that the radar jamming UAV which adopts the "8"-shaped path gets a much smaller path deviate cost, which means that the radar jam- ming UAV gets a much bigger jamming covering of fan than the other one. The connection between optimal path longitudinal length and jamming distance is presented when oppressive radar jamming UAV adopts the "8"-shaped path.
关 键 词:雷达干扰无人机 压制干扰航路 航路偏离代价 优选
分 类 号:TN97[电子电信—信号与信息处理] V279[电子电信—信息与通信工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222