“新政社合一”:农民合作的集体制度困境——以S市某农村合作社为例  

New Form of Government-Commune Integration:The Trap of Collective System in Rural Cooperatives——A Rural Cooperative in S City as An Example

作　　者：张文明[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学社会发展学院

出　　处：《社会科学》2015年第3期72-81,共10页Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"农村新型社区化与社会管理创新研究"(项目编号:13BHS022)及国家社会科学基金重大项目"有序推进农业转移人口市民化研究"(项目编号:13&ZD043)之子课题"在地农民的内生发展与就地城镇化"的阶段性成果

摘　　要：合作社成为目前推进"规模农业"和"家庭农场"经营模式的一个路径。但是在具体操作中其很难超越村级组织而形成"弱势群体通过互助达到自助的一个重要组织",这种合作社大多是村级集体组织直接参与或者"集体组织再建构(组建合作公司)"模式下的"集体式合作",其实质是:村落中的甚至村落外的行政精英借助于组织的集体属性宣示合作社存在的合理性,并通过对信息资本的控制来遮断农民与市场之间有效联系的特定控制集团,发展过程中面临"新政社合一"的障碍,只有把农民的土地产权、经营权、承包权、转让权的"四权"定价市场化、交易市场化评估并以此作为"入社资本"才能较好解决合作社遭遇的"集体制度困境"。The cooperative has currently become a new path to impel scale agriculture and household farm as business models. But in practice, it is difficult to surpass the village-level organizations to become the vital organizations of disadvantaged groups through their mutual aids. This kind of cooperatives mostly are involved with village collective organizations directly, or reconstructed by establishing cooperative companies, the essence of which is that political elites in or out of the village acclaim the validity of cooperatives through their collective property, and they block the connections between peasants and the market by controlling the information. Confronted with obstacles of new form of government-commune integration, only if the four kinds of rights （ land property right, management right, contract right, transfer right ） were priced and traded in accordance to the market and counted as capital of enrollment into the cooperatives, can the trap of collective system in rural cooperatives be solves properly.

关 键 词：合作社 集体制度 村级组织 

分 类 号：C912.81[经济管理]