石里克与亨普尔的确证概念比较  

Comparative Study on Schlick's and Hempel's Concept of Confirmation

作　　者：雷良[1] 涂亦嘉 

机构地区：[1]中南大学哲学系,湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《长沙理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第1期123-129,共7页Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology：Social Science

摘　　要：确证(confirmation)是科学哲学研究的一个重要论题。石里克与亨普尔两位哲学家采用语言分析的方法来建构确证理论,将实在与假说之间的关系转化为句子间的关系。但是二者在关于确证有效性的来源、确证与证实的关系、确证的效力范围、证据的构成方式等问题上有较大的分歧。这种差异的产生,表面上看是由于两位哲学家在逻辑与经验划分问题上有不同的理解所致,但深层原因却是二者对实在的性质作了不同的理解:石里克认为实在具有时空属性,必须结合具体时空来研究确证;亨普尔则认为没有充分的理由将时空坐标列为确证研究中必须考虑的因素之一。Confirmation is an important topic in philosophy of science.Through linguistic analyses,Schlick and Hempel constructed their theories of confirmation,conceiving the relationship between objects and hypothesis as relationship between sentences.However,they have great divergence as regards the source of the validity of confirmation,the relations between confirmation and evidence,the scope of validity of confirmation and the constitute forms of evidence.On the surface,the difference is due to their opinion on division of the logical and empirical;but in fact the prime cause is their different views on the character of reality.Schlick regards temporality as criterion of the real,so confirmation must be linked with space and time;while Hempel finds no sufficient reason to mention space-time coordinates in the study of confirmation.

关 键 词：石里克 亨普尔 确证 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]