中文人文社会科学学术图书评价的瓶颈因素及对策研究  

Bottleneck Factors and Countermeasures of the Evaluation of Chinese Academic Book in Humanities and Social Sciences

作　　者：王兰敬[1] 叶继元[2] 

机构地区：[1]河南大学工商管理学院,河南开封475004 [2]南京大学信息管理学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《图书与情报》2014年第6期82-87,共6页Library & Information

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学专项任务项目(科研诚信与学风建设)重大课题"学术规范与学科方法论研究"(项目编号:11JDXF001);河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目"人文社会科学学术图书创新与质量评价研究"(项目编号:2014-qn-393)研究成果之一

摘　　要：文章介绍了当下中文人文社会科学学术图书评价的现状,指出其主要瓶颈因素:工作量大、内容评价费时费力、学术图书的非定量化、非公式化特征以及非共识性特征等。在此基础上提出了一些建议和对策:精选一批有耐心和责任心的学科同行专家并建好用好同行评议专家库;建立规范的中文图书引文索引数据库;建立以同行专家定性评价为主、定量评价为辅的学术图书评价指标体系和评价方法;建立宽容"非共识"的评价制度。The bottleneck factors in present evaluation of Chinese book in humanities and social sciences are such as large workload,time consuming content evaluation,non-quantitative and non-formulaic characteristics of academic books and non-consensus of evaluation results. Suggestions and countermeasures advanced in this paper are： to select a batch of patient and responsible peer experts,to build and make good use of a peer review expert database,to establish standard citation index database of Chinese academic books,to establish the academic book evaluation index system and evaluation method dominated by peer view expert evaluation and supplemented by quantitative evaluation and to establish the evaluation system that tolerates non-consensus.

关 键 词：科研评价 人文社会科学评价 图书评价 

分 类 号：G311[文化科学]