检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华南肿瘤学国家重点实验室,中山大学附属肿瘤医院病理科,广东广州510060 [2]南方医科大学附属何贤纪念医院病理科,广东广州511400
出 处:《中外医疗》2014年第27期44-45,68,共3页China & Foreign Medical Treatment
摘 要:目的探讨免疫组化检查对于恶性胸膜间皮瘤与肺腺癌的诊断鉴别作用。方法收集恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者17例以及肺腺癌患者33例,采用免疫组化EnVision二步法进行检测,比较两种疾病患者的免疫组化检查结果。结果恶性胸膜间皮瘤的CD141、WT1、calretinin、EMA、CK5/6、B72.3、Ber-EP4、AE1/AE3、CEA的表达依次为82.4%、58.8%、58.8%、58.8%、64.7%、0.0%、5.9%、82.4%、0.0%,与肺腺癌的3.0%、9.1%、0.0%、97.0%、9.1%、72.7%、63.6%、100.0%、90.9%比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两种病变间Moc-31与HBME-1表达差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论免疫组化检查对于恶性胸膜间皮瘤与肺腺癌的诊断鉴别具有重要意义,以calretinin、CD141、WT-1、CEA与B72.3的敏感性与特异性最高。Objective To investigate the role of immunohistochemical examination in the differential diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma. Methods 17 cases of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma and 33 cases with lung adenocarcinoma were collected. Immunohistochemical EnVision two steps method was used for detection. And the immunohistochemical results of the two groups were compared. Results The expression of CD141, WT1, calretinin, EMA, CK5/6, B72.3, BerEP4, AE1/AE3, CEA in malignant pleural mesothelioma was 82.4%, 58.8%, 58.8%, 58.8%, 64.7%, 0.0%, 5.9%, 82.4%, 0.0%, respectively, and that in lung adenocarcinoma was 3.0%, 9.1%, 0.0%, 97.0%, 9.1%, 72.7%, 63.6%, 100.0%, 90.9%, respectively.There was significant difference between the two groups(P〈0.05). The expression of Moc-31 and HBME-1 between the two groups had no significant difference(P〉0.05). Conclusion Immunohistochemical examination plays an important role in the differential diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma, the sensitivity and specificity of calretinin, CD141, WT-1,CEA and B72.3 are the highest.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222