2012～2013年广西甘蔗区试品种综合评价  

Comprehensive evaluation of sugarcane varieties in Guangxi sugarcane regional trial during 2012-2013

作　　者：梁强[1] 刘晓燕[1] 董文斌[1] 李毅杰[1] 谢金兰[1] 周忠凤 陆文娟 李文教[4] 朱斌[5] 潘成烈 庞华莒 李翔[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国农业科学院甘蔗研究中心/广西农业科学院甘蔗研究所,南宁530007 [2]柳州市农业科学研究所,广西柳州545003 [3]河池市农业科学研究所,广西宜州546306 [4]百色市农业科学研究所,广西田阳533612 [5]北海市农业科学研究所,广西北海536000 [6]崇左湘桂糖业有限公司,广西崇左532202 [7]广西种子管理局,南宁530022

出　　处：《南方农业学报》2014年第12期2129-2136,共8页Journal of Southern Agriculture

基　　金：国家甘蔗产业技术体系广西创新团队建设专项项目(nycytxgxcxtd-02);广西农业科学院基本科研业务费专项项目(桂农科2014YZ04;桂农科2012YZ23;桂农科2013YM49)

摘　　要：【目的】综合评价13个参试甘蔗品种的丰产性、适应性和稳产性,为广西甘蔗新品种的审定和推广提供科学依据。【方法】以广西当前主栽品种ROC22为对照,于2012-2013年在南宁、柳州、河池、百色、北海、崇左6个试验点进行两年新植1年宿根甘蔗新品种比较试验和生产试验,对其丰产性、适应性和稳产性等进行综合评价。【结果】13个参试品种中,桂糖04-1045、桂糖05-1141、桂糖04-1545和柳糖07-95表现早熟、高糖、高产稳产,蔗茎产量分别比对照增产1.08%、4.53%、5.49%和9.45%,蔗糖分分别比对照提高0.517%、0.572%、0.784%和0.882%（绝对值）,产糖量分别比对照增加4.38%、8.51%、11.50%和16.09%;桂糖03-66和桂糖03-91蔗茎产量分别比对照减产14.53%和9.85%,蔗糖分分别比对照提高1.326%和0.829%（绝对值）,表现特早熟高糖,但产量较差;桂糖03-591和桂糖06-533蔗茎产量分别比对照增产12.65%和9.98%,蔗糖分分别比对照降低0.398%和0.627%（绝对值）,表现中熟高产,但糖分偏低;其他品种产量及蔗糖分表现均稍差。参试品种在各试验点表现不同,桂糖04-1545在南宁点表现较好,柳糖07-95、桂糖04-1045和桂糖04-1545在柳州点表现较好,桂糖05-1141、柳糖07-95、桂糖04-1545和桂糖04-1045在河池点表现较好,百色点没有表现增产且增糖的品种。【结论】桂糖04-1545、柳糖07-95、桂糖05-1141和桂糖04-1045在试验中综合表现较好,达到广西甘蔗品种审定的标准,建议因地制宜加以推广。【Objective】The high yield performance, adaptability and yield stability of 13 sugarcane varieties were comprehensively evaluated in order to provide scientific basis for the approval and registration, and extension of new sugarcane varieties in Guangxi. 【 Method 】 Taking ROC22 as the control, the comparative test and production test of two-year new planting and one-year ratoon for 13 new sugarcane varieties were conducted at 6 locations viz.,Nanning, Liuzhou, Hechi, Baise, Beihai and Chongzuo in Guangxi during 2012-2013. The high yield performance,adaptability and yield stability were evaluated by using Tai or AMMI model, and so on. 【Result 】Amongst the 13 tested sugarcane varieties, GT04-1045, GT05-1141, GT04-1545 and LT07-95 showed early maturity, high sucrose,high and stable yield. Their cane yield were increased by 1.08%, 4.53%, 5.49% and 9.45% compared with ROC22,the sucrose were increased by 0.517%, 0.572%, 0.784% and 0.882%（absolute value）, and the sugar yield were increased by 4.38%, 8.51%, 11.50% and 16.09% compared with ROC22, respectively. GT03-66 and GT03-91 showed special early maturing, high sucrose and poor yield. Although their sucrose were increased by 1.326 % and0.829%（absolute value）, the cane yields were decreased by 25.78% and 9.85% compared with ROC22, respectively.GT03-591 and GT06-533 were charactered by middle maturity, high yield and low sucrose, the cane yield increased by 12.65% and 9.98%, while the sucrose decreased by 0.398% and 0.627%（absolute value）compared with ROC22,respectively. According to the comprehensive performance of yield and sucrose, GT04-1545 had good performance in Nanning city, LT07-95, GT04-1045 and GT04-1545 had better performance in Liuzhou city, and GT05-1141,LT07-95, GT04-1545 and GT04-1045 presented good performance in Hechi city, but no varieties showed good performance both of cane yield and sucrose in Baise city. 【Conclusion 】GT05-1545, LT07-95, GT05-1141 and GT04-1045 showed good performance and reached the registration standard

关 键 词：甘蔗品种 区域试验 丰产性 适应性 综合评价 广西 

分 类 号：S566.1[农业科学—作物学]