检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘磊[1] 孙家元[1] 杨宗酉[1] 陈伟[1] 赵海涛[1] 王海立[1] 殷兵[1] 刘勃[1] 刘松[1] 张如云[1] 孙然[1] 程家祥[1] 孙涛[1] 李彦森[1] 张英泽[1]
机构地区:[1]河北医科大学第三医院创伤急救中心,河北省骨科研究所,河北省骨科生物力学重点实验室,石家庄050051
出 处:《中华创伤骨科杂志》2015年第1期71-74,共4页Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
摘 要:目的分析10年期间河北医科大学第三医院成人肱骨干骨折的流行病学特征及其变化趋势。方法对2003年1月至2012年12月河北医科大学第三医院收治的成人肱骨干骨折患者资料进行回顾性分析,记录患者的性别、年龄及骨折AO分型等数据。将2003年1月至2007年12月的患者资料定为A组,2008年1月至2012年12月的患者资料定为B组,比较两组患者的一般资料,总结出10年期间成人肱骨干骨折的流行病学特征及变化趋势。结果共收集1741例成人肱骨干骨折患者,男1185例,女556例,男女比为2.13:1;骨折高发年龄段为21~30岁(24.30%);12.A型骨折1136例(65.25%),12.B型骨折469例(26.94%),12-C型骨折136例(7.81%)。A组1205例,男女比为2.24:1;B组536例,男女比为L91:1;两组患者性别构成比比较差异无统计学意义(Х^2=2.040,P=0.153)。A组患者平均年龄[(37.5±16.0)岁]低于B组【(42.0±17.0)岁],差异有统计学意义(Z=-5.359,P=0.000)。两组患者年龄段构成比和AO分型构成比比较差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论成人肱骨干骨折高发年龄段为2l~30岁,平均年龄呈增长趋势;男性多于女性;骨折高发类型为12.A型,12-B型骨折有增多趋势。Objective To analyze the epidemiological features and trends of adult humeral shaft fractures from 2003 through 2012 in our hospital. Methods The clinical data were collected of the adult patients with humeral shaft fracture who had been treated between January 2003 and December 2012 in our hospital. The patients' gender, age and fracture type of AO classification were documented. The data from January 2003 to December 2007 were assigned into group A and those from January 2008 to December 2012 into group B. The 2 groups were compared to find out the general epidemiological characteristics and trends in the recent 10 years. Results A total of 1, 741 adults with humeral shaft fracture were collected, including 1 185 males and 556 females. The total male/female ratio was 2. 13: 1. The adult humeral shaft fractures predominated in an age range of 21 to 30 years (24.30%). There were 1,136 cases (65.25%) of type 12-A, 469 ones (26.94%) of type 12-B and 136 ones (7.81%) of type 12-C. The male/female ratio was 2. 24:1 in group A of 1, 205 patients and 1.91:1 in group B of 536 patients, showing no significant difference between groups (Х^2 = 2. 040, P = 0. 153) . The mean age of group A (37.5 ±16.0 years) was significantly younger than that of group B (42. 0 ±17.0 years) ( Z = - 5. 359, P = 0. 000). The differences in age distribution and AO fracture type distribution were statistically significant between the 2 groups ( P 〈 0.05). Conclusions The peak age of adult humeral shaft fractures was from 21 to 30 years. There were more male patients than female ones. There was an increasing trend in the mean age. The high-risk type was 12-A while type 12-B showed an increasing trend.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3