检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨蕊[1] 崔学艳[1] 李妍[1] 王鹏[1] 李宏建[1] 苏乐群[1]
出 处:《中国药房》2015年第6期777-780,共4页China Pharmacy
基 金:国家科技支撑计划课题(No.2013BAI06B04)
摘 要:目的:系统评价格列喹酮对比格列本脲治疗2型糖尿病的有效性和经济性,以为临床治疗提供循证参考。方法:计算机检索Pub Med、Medline、EMBase、Cochrane图书馆、中国期刊全文数据库、中文科技期刊全文数据库、万方数字化期刊全文数据库,收集格列喹酮对比格列本脲治疗2型糖尿病的有效性和经济性的随机对照试验(RCT),采用Rev Man 5.2统计软件对有效性进行系统评价,采用Treeage pro 2011软件绘制决策树模型进行成本-效果分析。结果:有效性部分纳入4项RCT,合计150例患者。Meta分析结果显示,格列喹酮与格列本脲治疗2型糖尿病的疗效相当,在改善患者空腹血糖水平[MD=0.67,95%CI(-0.09,1.42),P=0.08]和糖化血红蛋白水平[MD=0.25,95%CI(-0.12,0.62),P=0.18]方面,差异无统计学意义。经济性研究发现,格列喹酮对比格列本脲的增量成本-效果比为1 159.56元/Hb A1c。结论:格列喹酮与格列本脲治疗2型糖尿病的疗效相当,格列本脲的经济性较好。由于纳入研究数量较少,该结论有待大样本、高质量的RCT进一步验证。OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and economy of gliquidone versus glibenclamide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes systematically, and to provide evidence-based reference for clinical treatment. METHODS: Retrieved from PubMed, Medline, EMBase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang database, randomized controlled trials (RCT) about gliquidone vs. glibenclamide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes were collected; the effectiveness was evaluated by using Rev Man 5.2 software, and cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted with decision tree model drawn by Treeage pro 2011 software. RE- SULTS: 4 RCT were included, involving 150 patients in total. Results of Meta-analysis showed that therapeutic efficacy of gliqui- done was similar to glibenclamide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, and there was no statistical significance in the improvement of FPG [MD=0.67,95%CI(--0.09, 1.42),P=0.08] and HbA1c [MD=0.25,95%CI(--0.12,0.62) ,P=0.18]. Results of economy study showed, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of gliquidone vs. glibenclamide was 1 159.56 yuan/I-IbA1c. CON- CLUSIONS : Therapeutic efficacy of gliquidone is similar to glibenclamide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, glibenclamide has better economical efficiency. Due to the small number of included studies, it remains to be confirmed with large-samples and high-quality RCT.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.52