论作品实质性相似和版权侵权判定的路径选择——约减主义与整体概念和感觉原则  

On the Approaches of Judgment of Substantial Similarity of Works and Copyright Infringement——Reductionism Principle of Total Concept and Feel

作　　者：卢海君[1] 

机构地区：[1]对外经济贸易大学法学院,北京100029

出　　处：《政法论丛》2015年第1期138-145,共8页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：对外经济贸易大学学科建设专项经费资助(项目编号:XK2014406);2013年度北京市哲学社会科学规划项目"北京市文化创意产业保护的立法研究"(项目编号:13FXC037);北京高等学校"青年英才计划(2013)"(项目编号:YETP0919)的阶段性成果

摘　　要："约减主义"与"整体概念和感觉原则"是判断实质性相似和版权侵权的两种不同路径,前者在确定客体可版权性范围的时候主张对作品进行分析和解构,后者则从整体上对该范围进行确定,适用上述两种不同的分析路径所导致的版权保护范围实际上是不同的。约减主义通常适用于文字作品中,整体概念与感觉原则通常适用于视觉艺术作品与音乐作品中。为防止整体概念与感觉原则的适用不适当地扩大版权保护范围,在视觉艺术作品与音乐作品的场合,即使存在整体概念与感觉相近的嫌疑,尚须考察引发这种嫌疑的因素,其如果是不具有可版权性的要素,版权侵权不成立;反之,如果是具有可版权性的要素,版权侵权成立。Reductionism and principle of total concept and feel are the two approaches to judge substantial similarity and copyright infringement. The former argues that we should analyze and dissect the works when we define the scope of the subject matter of copyright which is usually applied in literary works. The latter argues that the works should be estimate in their entireties which is usually applied in visual art works and music works. The different scope of protection will be defined by the two ways. For limit the latter within the proper scope,in the case of visual artistic works and music works,albeit the plaintiff argues that the two works are similar in the sense of total concept and feel,the causes which result in the similarity should be examined to guarantee that the causing elements are copyrightable.

关 键 词：实质性相似 版权侵权 约减主义 整体概念和感觉原则 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]