检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学中医药学院,广东广州510515
出 处:《针灸临床杂志》2015年第1期25-28,共4页Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion
摘 要:目的:比较常规针刺与经筋疗法治疗腰背肌筋膜炎的临床疗效。方法:80例腰背肌筋膜炎患者,按随机数字表法随机分为常规针刺组(40例)及经筋疗法组(40例),分别进行常规针刺及经筋疗法治疗,治疗4个疗程后观察两组治疗前后Mc Gill量表、身体损害指数评定量表,并观察疗效。结果:简化Mc Gill量表评分表明,两组治疗后与治疗前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.05);治疗后比较,经筋疗法改善程度均优于常规针刺组(P<0.05);身体损害指数评定量表(PII)评分表明,常规针刺组腰后伸、仰卧起坐治疗后较治疗前有好转(P<0.05);经筋疗法组腰前屈、腰后伸、脊柱触痛、仰卧起坐及总分均较治疗前有改善(P<0.05);两组比较,在腰前屈、脊柱触痛及总分测试上有统计学差异(P<0.05),其余项均无统计学差异(P>0.05);总疗效评定表明,经筋疗法组治疗后总有效率90%,常规针刺组有效率70%,两组比较有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:常规针刺与经筋疗法对腰背肌筋膜炎均有较好的治疗效果,但经筋疗法的治疗效果优于常规针刺。Objective:To compare clinically curative effects on waist and back muscle fasciitis treated by nor- mal acupuncture and the Jingjin therapy ;Methods:80 patients with low back muscle fasciitis were randomly di- vided into a normal acupuncture group (40 cases) and a Jingjin treatment group (40 cases), respectively. For ordinary acupuncture and the Jingjin treatment, after four treatment periods, observe McGill scale before and af- ter treatment, body damage index rating scale and the total curative effect in both groups. Results:As to the simplified MeGill scale, the two groups after treatment were compared with before treatment and there was a sta- tistical significance ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; after treatment, the improved muscle therapy was superior to the ordinary acu- puncture group (P 〈 0.05 ). As to the body damage index rating scale ( PⅡ), ordinary acupuncture group after the waist stretched, sit - ups were improved after treatment compared with before treatment ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; after the waist muscle therapy group proneness, waist stretch, spine tenderness, sit -ups and total scores were im- proved ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; compared between two groups, as to the lumbar flexion, spine tenderness and total score there was a statistical difference (P 〈 0.05 ), and the rest of the items and the total score had no statistical difference ( P 〉 0. 05 ). As to the total curative effect evaluation, after Jingjin treatment the total effectiveness was 90%, and in the ordinary acupuncture group the effectiveness was 70%, and there was a statistical signifi- cance ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion: Normal acupuncture and the Jingjin treatment for lumbar back muscle fasciitis have a good treatment effect, but the effect of muscle therapy treatment is superior to the ordinary acupuncture.
分 类 号:R246.2[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3