检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京协和医院耳鼻喉科,100730 [2]北京清华长庚医院心导管室,102218
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2014年第36期4591-4593,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
摘 要:目的:了解医院护理辅助人员职业防护知识现状及其影响因素。方法采用自行设计的问卷对北京市某三级甲等综合医院97名护理辅助人员的职业防护知识现状及其相关因素进行调查。结果97名护理辅助人员防护知识总得分为(31.87±0.244)分,得分正确率范围为71.1%~100%。相关性分析显示,工作年限与防护知识呈正相关(r=0.358,P<0.05)。接受过院内培训的护理辅助人员其物理和化学防护得分高于未接受培训者,差异有统计学意义(Z值分别为-2.314,-2.000;P<0.05)。结论护理辅助人员职业标准化亟待建立,护理辅助人员的防护知识还有待提高,应根据护理辅助人员的工作年限进行持续的有侧重点的强化培训。Objective To investigate the state of hospital nursing assistants occupational protection knowledge and its relative factors .Methods One hundred nursing assistants in a three general hospital were investigated by using self-designed questionnaire , their knowledge of occupational protection and its effect factors were analyzed.Results The total score of occupational protection knowledge was (31.87 ±0.244), with range of the correct item rated from 71.13% to 100%.Correlation analysis showed that work years significantly relative to total protection knowledge score (r =0.358,P 〈0.05).The physical and chemical protection knowledge score of trained person were higher than the untrained person , the differences were statistically significant (Z=-2.314,-2.00, respectively; P〈0.05).Conclusions Scores of occupational protection knowledge among nursing assistants still need to improve , and the occupational standards of nursing assistants also necessary to establish .So according nursing assistants work experiences and situations to emphasize their specialize training are very necessary in the future .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.71