论菲律宾诉中国南海争端仲裁案中的管辖权问题  

The Jurisdiction Problem of the Philippines-China Arbitral Proceedings over South China Sea

作　　者：闫卫军[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海外国语大学法学院,上海200083

出　　处：《河北法学》2015年第3期93-104,共12页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：上海外国语大学重点项目<国际法学前沿问题研究>(KX161015)阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：菲律宾依据《联合国海洋法公约》有关强制争端解决程序的规定,就其与中国在南海海域的争议启动了仲裁程序。但强制仲裁程序的启动必须满足《联合国海洋法公约》所规定的前提条件,同时又受到若干限制。仲裁庭将如何裁决本案管辖权问题,需视菲律宾的举证情况以及仲裁庭对某些法律问题的裁决而定,我国应客观理性地进行评估,不应盲目乐观。The Philippines has initiated arbitral proceedings with respect to its dispute with China concerning the South China Sea by invoking the compulsory dispute settlement provisions of the Law of Sea Convention. However such arbitral proceedings are subject to some preconditions and limitations. Justification of the arbitral jurisdiction depends on the evidences to be provided by the Philippines and the adjudication of some certain legal issues by the arbitral tribunal. But an overall review reveals likely negative result on the part of China.

关 键 词：南海 海洋法公约 强制争端解决程序 仲裁 管辖权 

分 类 号：DF935[政治法律—国际法学]