检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福州大学经济与管理学院,福州350116 [2]厦门大学经济与文化研究中心,厦门361005 [3]厦门大学经济学院,厦门361005
出 处:《系统工程理论与实践》2015年第2期324-332,共9页Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基 金:国家自然科学基金(71273216);福建省社会科学基金(2011B230)
摘 要:在代际交叠模型的基础上,构建了分权体制下中央和区域政府公共教育投入的动态博弈模型,探讨了存在区域不平衡情形下两级政府公共教育投入分担及其对区域差距演变的影响.分析显示,中央政府是否应进行公共教育投入依赖于区域差距的程度,但二者并不呈单调正相关关系,同时导出并分析了在区域差距程度的不同范围下中央和区域政府的均衡教育投入分担,并进一步据此探讨了差距的演变趋势.最后,结合我国实际,讨论了政策含义.This paper studies the education policy choices in a decentralized economy with two levels of governments and regional income disparity. We employ a dynamic game model incorporating overlapping generations to analyze the optimal education spending of the central and local governments, and the subsequent effects of such financing arrangements on the dynamics of regional income distribution. We show that, whether the central government should provide public education and what level should be provided would depend on the extent of regional disparity. Only when the disparity is large could the provision of public education by the central government improve social welfare and reduce regional disparity over time. The optimal education expenditure of central government, however, does not monotonically increase with the extent of regional disparity. Finally, policy implications for China are discussed.
分 类 号:F062.6[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.37