检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江西农业大学经济管理学院,讲师南昌330045 [2]中国行政管理学会,执行副会长兼秘书长北京100017 [3]江西师范大学外语学院,讲师南昌330026
出 处:《中国行政管理》2015年第3期43-46,共4页Chinese Public Administration
摘 要:行政复议制度已实施多年,其效果远未达到设计初衷,行政复议还没有成为人民群众维护自身权益的首选渠道。行政复议制度效果的检验标准必然应该包含行政相对人对行政复议制度的反馈。基于行政相对人的视角,探究其参与行政复议的动力所在,据此拟定相关对策,充分调动广大群众选择行政复议作为维权的制度渠道的积极性,既有利于行政复议救济功能的发挥,也有利于和谐社会的建设。The system of administrative reconsideration has been implemented for many years, but the effect designed goal, and administrative reconsideration has not become the first channel to safeguard is far from its the rights and interests of the public. The feedback from administrative counterpart should be one of the important criterions for the system itself. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the motivation of participation and draw up counter- measures from the perspective of administrative counterpart, to fully mobilize the public to join in the administrative reconsideration system, which can not only play a significant role in the relief function of administrative reconsideration, but also in building a harmonious society.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222