检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王晶[1] 真亚[2] 邹圣容[2] 马铼枫 邹圣强[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏大学灾难与急救医学系,镇江市急救中心,镇江212003 [2]江苏大学附属人民医院 [3]镇江市京口社区卫生服务中心
出 处:《中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志》2015年第1期25-27,共3页China Journal of Emergency Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine
基 金:镇江市社会发展支撑项目(SH2010045)
摘 要:目的 调查转诊社区急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的临床特征,为制定AMI双向转诊指南提供参考.方法 回顾调查2012年7月1日~2013年6月30日镇江市单向转诊的社区AMI患者117例,根据年龄分为老年组(>65岁)和非老年组(≤65岁),比较两组临床特征.结果 社区AMI患者的临床特征为:非老年组男女性别比例差距大、老年组有冠心病和脑血管意外病史的较多、老年组发病时心功能较差、非老年组接受急诊冠状动脉介入(PCI)手术较多,P<0.05.结论 转诊社区AMI患者,在性别比例、冠心病和脑血管意外病史、发病时心功能、选择急诊PCI等方面有差异.ObjectiveTo explore acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients' clinical features who were transferred from community clinic and provide reference for setting the bilateral-transfer referral guide. Methods An retrospective analysis was conducted on 117 AMI patients who were transferred in one-way referral. They were divided into two groups, group A of patients aged 65 and above, and group B of patients younger than 65. Their clinical features were compared. Results A significant difference in gander and higher number of PCI operation were found in the group B, while a higher number of coronary heart disease history and cerebrovascular accidents with poor heart function were found in group, P 〈0.05. Conclusion The following important factors should be given a consideration when referring AMI patients from community: patient' s gender, a history of coronary heart disease and eerebrovascular accident, and etc.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229