检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]三峡大学电气与新能源学院,湖北宜昌443002 [2]国网湖北省荆州供电公司检修分公司,湖北荆州434000
出 处:《通信电源技术》2015年第1期52-54,58,共4页Telecom Power Technology
摘 要:风电场和抽水蓄能电站联合运营具有较好的经济效益,文中研究了两者的利润分配问题。分析了风电场和抽水蓄能电站的建设成本、资金成本和运行维护成本;介绍了利润分配的原则和几种常用方法;最后通过实例仿真,得到不同分配方法下两者的获利。比较得知,Shapely值法在该利润分配中最合理,更能使两者维持长期良好的联合运营。确定的分配方案为:风电场得到总利润的89.48%,抽水蓄能电站获利占10.52%。Since joint operation of wind farm and pumped storage power station is proved economical, how to allocate profits between the two remains a problem and is studied in the article. Firstly, the construction cost, cost of funds and op- eration and maintenance cost of wind farm and pumped storage power station are analyzed respectively. Then, the principle and common methods of profit distribution are introduced. Finally, the profits of wind farm and pumped storage power sta-tion under different distribution methods are obtained by practical simulation, which indicates that Shapely value method is the most reasonable in maintaining long-term good joint operation. The final scheme is determined as wind farm and pumped storage power station accounting for 89. 5% and 10. 5% of the total profit respectively.
关 键 词:风电场 抽水蓄能电站 联合运营 利润分配 Shapely值法
分 类 号:F406.7[经济管理—产业经济] TV743[水利工程—水利水电工程] TM614[电气工程—电力系统及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15