检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川大学水力学与山区河流开发保护国家重点实验室,成都610065 [2]攀枝花学院土木工程系,四川攀枝花617000
出 处:《水利科技与经济》2015年第2期4-6,共3页Water Conservancy Science and Technology and Economy
摘 要:利用FLUENT中的k-ε湍流模型和VOF模型,对非淹没的圆头、拐头和梯形丁坝回流区流场进行了数值模拟。首先将文献试验与模型计算进行了对比,结果吻合良好。然后进一步对不同类型丁坝进行了模拟。计算结果表明,不同类型丁坝的坝后回流区范围不同,圆头坝坝后回流区范围最大(涡长和涡宽),拐头坝次之,梯形坝最小。同一丁坝下,随着水深增加,圆头坝和拐头坝坝后回流区范围减小,且越接近水面减小越慢;梯形坝由于有坡度,结果与前两个丁坝结果相反。The flow field in the backflow zone of the round -head, turn-head and trapezoidal dike has been simulated based on the k-ε and VOF model in fluent. First, comparisons about the simu-lation and experiment are made and the results are good .Further , simulations of different dikes are conducted , it is concluded that the backflow zone of the round -head dike is the largest , that of the turn-head dike is the second , and that of the trapezoidal dike is the third .The range of the back-flow is smaller and smaller with the water depth increasing , and this tend is slow near the surface . The result of the trapezoidal dike is opposite because of the slope .
分 类 号:TV641[水利工程—水利水电工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.47.108