检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:阮彩莲[1]
出 处:《解剖学报》2015年第1期91-93,共3页Acta Anatomica Sinica
基 金:陕西省科学技术研究发展计划资助项目(2011K13-02-06);陕西省教育厅专项科研计划资助项目(2010JK911);陕西省卫生厅卫生科研基金资助项目(2010H24)
摘 要:目的对比动力髋螺钉(DHS)与股骨近端解剖锁定板(PFLP)内固定治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折(IFF)疗效。方法将我院收治的149例高龄IFF患者依据手术方式差异分组,其中75例给予PFLP内固定设为PFLP组,其余74例给予DHS内固定设为DHS组,对比两组疗效。结果 PFLP组手术所用时间(81.1±6.9)min与失血量(254.3±47.9)ml均明显低于DHS组的(86.8±12.5)min、(286.1±34.7)ml(P<0.05)。两组术前功能评分差异不大(P>0.05);PFLP组术后第90天、180天、360天评分分别为70.6±6.8、81.5±7.3、83.5±8.6,明显高于DHS组的44.9±7.0、52.7±6.3、61.5±6.9,术后不同时间点PFLP组功能评分明显更理想(P<0.05)。结论采用闭合复位经皮PFLP内固定治疗高龄IFF患者,操作简便且疗效确切。Objective To compare the curative effect of the dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femur anatomic locking plate internal fixation (PFLP) for senile intertrochanteric fractures (IFF). Methods A total of 149 elderly patients with IFF. According to the operation way, the patients were classified as PFLP internal fixation group (75 cases) and D/IS internal fixation group (74 cases). The curative effect was compared between two groups. Results The used time (81.1 ±6. 9)min and blood loss (254.3 ±47.9 ml) of the PFLP group were significantly less than DHS group (86. 8 ± 12. 5)min and (286. 1 ±34. 7 ml) (P 〈 0. 05). Preoperative functional scores of the two groups were similar (P 〉 0. 05). The postoperative scores after 90 days, 180 days, 360 days were 70.6 ± 6.8, 81.5 ± 7.3, 83.5 ± 8.6 in the PFLP group which were significantly higher than that of DHS group (44.9 ± 7.0, 52. 7 ± 6.3,61.5 ± 6.9) ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion The closed reduction and percutaneous PFLP internal fixation in the treatment of elderly patients with IFF has better curative effect.
关 键 词:闭合复位 股骨近端解剖锁定板 股骨粗隆间骨折 临床解剖学 人
分 类 号:R322[医药卫生—人体解剖和组织胚胎学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117