上海田子坊地区更新机制研究  

A Study on the Regeneration Mechanism in Tianzifang Area,Shanghai

作　　者：孙施文[1] 周宇[2] 

机构地区：[1]同济大学建筑与城市规划学院,高密度人居环境生态与节能教育部重点实验室 [2]同济大学建筑与城市规划学院

出　　处：《城市规划学刊》2015年第1期39-45,共7页Urban Planning Forum

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助;城市规划实施评价及其方法研究(项目批准号为51178315)

摘　　要：在描述田子坊地区更新改造过程及其困难的基础上,揭示了推动这项更新能够不断推进的动力原因和作用机制。上海从工业型城市向后工业型城市和消费型城市转变的社会需求和相关政策,为田子坊地区的更新改造提供了社会经济和政策的基础,而缺乏里弄住宅更新的相关制度、现行的房地产开发制度又限制了居民自主的更新行为,由此构成了田子坊地区更新进程中的最大矛盾。在上海改革开放中实行的行政权下放,赋予了街道办事处独特的地位和作用,使其能够在田子坊地区的更新过程中调动社会各类资源,不断扩大利益团体,争取到广大居民、艺术家、商户和消费者以及城市学者、建筑师、历史保护者、各类媒体以及不同层级的政府部门的支持,从而推进了田子坊地区更新的不断发展。但是,随着一些既有制度被突破,新的制度尚未有效建立,从而导致该地区居民与商户之间的矛盾仍时有爆发,这是田子坊地区过去发展以及未来进一步发展的重要制约。This paper analyzes the regeneration process of Tianzifang, summariz- es main characteristics and difficulties at each stage, and expounds the mecha- nism that pushed forward the regeneration effort. The principal contradiction in the process was between the demands stemming from the post-industrial transfor- mation of Shanghai and the policy and institutional vacuum in the regeneration of Lilong housing areas, such as regulations that restrict residents ability to carry out self-renovation. The paper argues that the Jiedao authority, or the urban sub-district offices in China, plays a key role among others in the regeneration process, because it holds the executive power delegated from the municipal gov- ernment and it solicited the support from various interest groups such as resi- dents, artists, business owners, consumers, urbanist, preservation scholars, and me- dia to break the institutional limitations and to promote the regeneration progress. Because the new regime had not taken full shape after the old one was broken down, the conflicts between residents and business owners still continued, which may restrict further regeneration efforts in Tianzifang area.

关 键 词：城市转型 城市更新 社会网络 街道办事处 上海田子坊 

分 类 号：TU984.114[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]