检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱春芳[1] 葛红山[1] 陈华[1] 习海涛[1] 黄检英[1] 吕杰强[1]
机构地区:[1]温州医科大学附属第二医院生殖中心,325000
出 处:《医学研究杂志》2015年第1期66-69,共4页Journal of Medical Research
基 金:浙江省重点科技创新团队(2011R50013-17);浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(LQ12H04001)
摘 要:目的 探讨非选择性单胚胎移植(non-elective single embryo transfer,non-eSET)的妊娠结局和相关因素对妊娠结局的影响.方法 回顾性分析2008年1月~2013年5月在笔者中心实施的体外受精-胚胎移植周期中行非选择性单胚胎移植的181个周期,分析不同的体外受精方式、胚胎质量和促排卵方案对非选择性单胚胎移植妊娠结局的影响.结果 非选择性单胚胎移植的临床妊娠率为12.71%.单精子胞质内注射(ICSI)组的正常受精率(2PN率)显著高于常规体外受精(IVF)组(75.48% vs56.46%,P<0.05),但是临床妊娠率(16.36% vs 11.11%,P>0.05)差异无统计学意义;A级胚胎组的临床妊娠率(28.26%)显著高于B级胚胎组(9.52%)、C级胚胎组(6.89%)、D级胚胎组(6.25%)的各组临床妊娠率,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).长方案组的临床妊娠率与微刺激组相比差异无统计学意义(16.39% vs 14.29%,P>0.05),因此采用微刺激方案实施治疗可能具有更高的性价比.结论 非选择性单胚胎移植的临床妊娠率与胚胎质量相关.Objective To analyze the pregnant outcomes of non - elective single embryo transfer ( non - eSET) and investigate effect of related factors on the clinical pregnancy rate of non - eSET. Methods A retrospective analysis was carried out on in vitro fertili- zation - embryo transfer (IVF - ET) cycles between January 2008 and May 2013, and only one embryo was available to transfer in 181 cy- cles. The effect of diffenent insemination methods, embryo quality and different controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols was studied. Results The average clinical pregnancy rate was 12.71% in the 181 non- eSET cycles. The rate of 2PN in the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) group was significantly higher than that in the IVF group(75.48% vs 56.46% , P 〈 0.05 ). But the clinical pregnant rates( 16.36% vs 11. 11% , P 〉 0.05 )had no statistically significant difference. The clinical pregnancy rates were 28.26% , 9.52% , 6. 89% and 6.25% in the A embryo group, B embryo group, C embryo group and D embryo group respectively, and the clinical pregnan- cy rate of A embryo group was significantly higher than other three groups ( P 〈 O. 05 ). The clinical pregnancy rate of the long protocol group was just a little higher than the mild stimulation protocol group( 16.39% vs 14.29% , P 〉 O. 05 ) , so the the mild stimulation proto- col group may have higher cost - effectiveness. Conclusion The clinical pregnancy rate closely related to the embryo quality in the non - eSET cycles.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28