检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志》2015年第5期377-379,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
摘 要:目的对脑卒中自我效能感问卷(SSEQ)进行汉化并测定其中文版信效度。方法使用SSEQ对245例社区脑卒中患者进行调查,并对测定结果进行信效度分析。结果SSEQ的重测信度为0.683,整个量表的Cronbachd系数为0.914,2个维度的Cronbachd系数分别为0.751和0.846;因子分析共提取2个公因子,累积方差贡献率为59.284%,且各条目在其公因子上的因子载荷均〉0.4;采用一般自我效能感量表(GsEs臌效标效度,SSEQ得分与GSES得分的Pearson相关系数为0.72,SSEQ2个维度日常活动、自我管理与GSES的Pearson相关系数分别为0.63和0.52。结论SSEQ中文版具有较好的信效度,适合评价脑卒中患者的自我效能感。Objective The research aimed to translate the English version of the Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SSEQ) into Chinese and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of SSEQ in patients after stroke. Methods Totally 245 patients after stroke were recruited and were investigated by the Chinese version of SSEQ. Results The test-retest reliability of SSEQ was 0.683. The internal consistency coefficient of the Chinese version of SSEQ was 0.914, the internal consistency coefficient of the two dimensions were 0.751 and 0.846. Factor analysis got two factors, which explained 59.284% of the total variance. Factor loading of common factor for each item was above 0.4. Using GSES as an external criterion, the correlation coefficient of the SSEQ and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) scores was 0.72. The correlation coefficients of two dimensions of daily activity and self-management of SSEQ with GSES were 0.63 and 0.52. Conclusions The Chinese version of SSEQ has been proved to be reliable and valid. It can be used as a valid tool for the measurement of self-efficacy in patients after stroke.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3