审查起诉程序中侦查监督权行使论略  

On the Performance of Detection Supervisory Authority in Investigation and Prosecution Procedures

作　　者：刘倩[1] 

机构地区：[1]太原科技大学法学院,山西太原030024

出　　处：《中北大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第1期18-23,共6页Journal of North University of China：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：审查起诉程序兼具时间性与空间性,侦查监督作为一项制度,与审查起诉之间的耦合性表现在侦、控、辩三者的博弈之中。刑事诉讼法修改引致刑事证据制度的变革,进而传导刷新法律监督理念、刑事证据认识以及人权保障理念。具体体现在:刑事证据法定种类更具规范化、非法证据排除规则正式入法、证明标准有所抬升、辩护律师权利扩张。侦、控、辩三方结构的推进,促使检察机关不应简单被迫接受,而应主动探索侦查监督新机制,更加注重侦查取证过程的监督力度,更加注重倾听其他诉讼参加人的意见,更加注重实现侦查监督中预防与纠错的结合,完善侦查监督纠错机制和惩戒制度。The investigation and prosecution procedures have such features as timeliness and spatiality.Investigation supervision,as a system,is used with detection,prosecution and argument in the coupling between investigation supervision and investigation and prosecution.Revision of Criminal Procedure Law resulted in the revolution of system of criminal evidence,accompanied by the revolution of legal supervision conception,criminal evidence cognition as well as human right idea.In practical terms,legal categories of criminal evidence law is more standard,exclusionary rules of illegally obtained evidence is put into the law officially,standard of evidence is raised,and defense attorney＇s rights are enlarged.Combination of detection,prosecution and argument requires that investigating and prosecuting apparatus should not be passive receivers.Instead,they should actively explore new system for investigation supervision and attach more attention to the surveillance dynamics in process of investigation for detecting evidence,other litigious participants＇ suggestion,the combination of prevention and correction in investigation supervision,and complete the systems of investigation supervision correction and punishment.

关 键 词：证据制度变革 侦查监督 审查起诉 

分 类 号：D926.3[政治法律—法学]