检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉大学水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室,武汉430072
出 处:《水力发电学报》2015年第2期112-117,共6页Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering
摘 要:长河坝水电站为典型的高水头、大泄量的电站,多洞联合泄流,采用挑流消能方式,此类工程对下游河道的消能防冲具有很高的要求。为解决初始阶段水工模型试验挑流消能不充分、水舌空间流态较差的现象,结合工程实际和以往经验,以大比尺水工模型试验为手段,比较了2#泄洪洞在等宽和窄缝挑坎两种形式下单独泄洪和联合泄洪的消能防冲效果,进一步验证了窄缝挑坎和扩散挑坎的有机结合在多洞联合泄洪过程中所体现的优越之处。本文的研究成果对同类型的消能防冲设计有一定的借鉴意义。The Changheba hydropower station is typical of high head and large capacity of multi-tunnel combined discharge with flip-bucket energy dissipaters that require a great capacity of the downstream river channel in energy dissipation and anti-scour. Large-scale hydraulic model tests have been conducted to solve the problems of insufficient energy dissipation and poor condition of nappes plunging into river at the initial stage. For slit-bucket and constant-width flip bucket, we compared their effects of energy dissipation and anti-scour on the second spillway in the conditions of individual operation and combined operation, and verified the advantages of combined slit-bucket and flip bucket for multi-tunnel combined operation. The results are useful for design of similar energy dissipation and anti-scour structures.
关 键 词:工程水力学 窄缝挑坎 等宽挑坎 模型试验 消能防冲 长河坝水电站
分 类 号:TV653[水利工程—水利水电工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15