中文版哮喘感知控制力问卷的信效度研究  

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Perceived Control of Asthma Questionnaire

作　　者：常玉霞[1] 黄莉莉[2] 杨玉洁[3] 

机构地区：[1]河南省人民医院急诊医学部,郑州450003 [2]河南省人民医院心血管内科,郑州450003 [3]河南省人民医院神经内科,郑州450003

出　　处：《中国实用护理杂志》2015年第1期56-58,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing

摘　　要：目的引进哮喘感知控制力问卷（Perceived Control of Asthma Questionnaire，PCAQ），并测定其中文版信效度。方法使用中文版PCAQ调查了125例呼吸内科门诊就诊的哮喘患者，并对测定结果进行信效度分析。结果中文版PCAQ的Cronbachd系数在0．815—0．904，均〉0．70；分半系数为0．647，重测信度为0．818，说明中文版PCAQ具有良好的内部一致性。内容效度（content validityin—dex，cvl）平均值为0．952；因子分析共提取3个公因子，累积贡献率为46．079％；且各条目的因子载荷均〉0．4。结论中文版PCAQ具有较好的信效度，可以用其评价哮喘患者的感知控制力。Objective We aimed to translate the English version of Perceived Control of Asthma Ques- tionnaire （PCAQ） into Chinese and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of PCAQ in asthma patients. Methods Totally 125 patients with asthma were recruited and were investigated by the Chinese version of PCAQ. The results underwent reliability and validity test. Results The Cronbach＇s ct coefficient of the Chinese version of PCAQ ranged from 0.815 to 0.904, higher than 0.7. The split half coef- ficient was 0.647; the test-retest reliability was 0.818, which showed that internal consistency of Chinese version of PCAQ was good. The content validity index was 0.952. Factor analysis got 3 factors, which ex- plained 46.079% of the total variance; the factor loading of each item was 〉0.4. Conclusions The Chi- nese version of PCAQ has been proved to be reliable and valid. It can be used as a valid tool for the mea- surement of perceived control in asthma patients.

关 键 词：哮喘感知控制力问卷 哮喘 效度 信度 

分 类 号：R473.5[医药卫生—护理学]