跌倒效能量表（瑞典版）的汉化及信效度检验  

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Falls Efficacy Scale （Swedish version）

作　　者：杨玉洁[1] 王静[2] 黄莉莉[2] 常玉霞[3] 

机构地区：[1]河南省人民医院神经内科,郑州450003 [2]河南省人民医院心血管内科,郑州450003 [3]河南省人民医院急诊科,郑州450003

出　　处：《中国实用护理杂志》2015年第2期140-142,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing

摘　　要：目的对跌倒效能量表（瑞典版）【FES（S）】进行汉化并测定其中文版信效度。方法使用FEs（s）对145例郑州市某三级甲等医院神经内科住院的脑卒中患者进行调查，并对测定结果进行信效度分析。结果整个问卷的Cronbach仅系数为0．896，日常活动能力、工具性日常生活能力2个维度的CronbachOt系数分别为O．863和O．872；问卷的分半系数为0．653，重测信度为0．743。根据相关公式计算内容效度（CVI），评价问卷各指标的CVI值为0．896～1．000，所有指标的平均CVI为0．925，且各条目的CVI值均在0．8以上；因子分析共提取2个公因子，累积方差贡献率为40．852％；除条目5外，其余各条目在其公因子上的因子载荷均〉O.4。结论FES（S）中文版具有较好的信效度，适合评价脑卒中患者的跌倒效能或自信心。Objective We tried to translate the English version of the Falls Efficacy Scale, Swedish version [FES （S）] into Chinese and test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of FES （S） in pa- tients after stroke. Methods Totally 145 patients after stroke were recruited and were investigated by the Chinese version of FES （S）. The result underwent analysis of reliability and validity. Results The inter- nal consistency coefficient of the Chinese version of FES （S） were 0.896. The Crenbach＇s ct coefficient of two dimensions, which were Activity of Daily Living Ability and Instrumental Activity of Daily Living, were 0.863 and 0.872. The split half coefficient was 0.653, test-retest reliability was 0.743. The content validity index（CV/） was calculated according to related formulas, which was 0.896-1.000, the average CVI of all items was 0.925, CVI of each item was above 0.8. Factor analysis got two factors, which explained 40.852% of the total variance. Except for item 5, other items showed factor loading 〉0.4 for its common factor. Conclusions The Chinese version of FES （S） has been proved to be reliable and valid. It can be used as a valid tool for assessing stroke patients with risk for falls and self-confidence.

关 键 词：跌倒效能量表(瑞典版) 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R473.74[医药卫生—护理学]