检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]辽宁师范大学心理学院 [2]辽宁省大连市沙河口区玉华小学,116021
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2015年第1期116-119,共4页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目(编号:11AZD089)
摘 要:目的:编制小学生尴尬情绪家长评定问卷并检验其信度和效度。方法:在理论检索和开放式问卷调查的基础上构建问卷题目,通过预测修改和筛选题目。对535名小学生正式施测,运用探索性和验证性因素分析确定问卷结构,并对其信效度进行检验。结果:正式问卷共15个项目,包括违背性尴尬和关注性尴尬2个维度,累积解释率为48.81%。问卷及各维度的同质性信度为0.787~0.864,分半信度为0.797~0.884,重测信度为0.742~0.853。验证性因素分析表明问卷结构效度良好(χ^2=151.404,χ^2/df=1.701,RMR=0.042,SRMR=0.051,GFI=0.912,AGFI=0.881,IFI=0.801,TLI=0.908,CFI=0.922,RMSEA=0.051)。结论:该问卷可以作为研究小学生尴尬情绪的有效工具,为小学生心理健康辅导提供参考。Objective: To develop the Parents- reported Embarrassment Scale for primary school children and examine its reliability and validity. Methods: On the base of literature review and open questionnaire,original items were developed. The researcher modified and screened items through forecast. After that 535 primary students were investigated. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used to determine the final structure of the scale and test its reliability and validity. Results: The final vision consisted of 15 items,including 2 factors,namely violate embarrassment and concern embarrassment,accumulative contribution rate was 48. 81%. The homogeneity reliability of scale and 2 dimensions were 0. 787 ~0. 864,split- half reliability were 0. 797 ~ 0. 884,retest reliability were 0. 742 ~ 0. 853. The confirmatory factor analysis showed the scale had satisfying structure validity( χ^2= 151. 404,χ^2/ df = 1. 701,RMR =0. 042,SRMR = 0. 051,GFI = 0. 912,AGFI = 0. 881,IFI = 0. 801,TLI = 0. 908,CFI = 0. 922,RMSEA =0. 051). Conclusion: The scale can be applied for relevant researches on embarrassment and offer references about mental health counseling of children.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3