检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军96363部队57分队 [2]中国人民解放军南京政治学院基础部
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2015年第1期119-122,共4页China Journal of Health Psychology
摘 要:目的:探索基层部队士兵连队归属感的结构维度并编制基层部队士兵连队归属感问卷。方法:综合运用文献法、开放式问卷调查、访谈等方法,编制出55个题目的初始问卷,然后运用探索性因素分析对初始问卷试测结果进行统计分析。结果:形成了包含6个维度共34个项目的基层部队士兵连队归属感问卷。6个维度可解释总方差的61.513%,项目载荷在0.468~0.783之间。问卷的分半信度系数值在0.714~0.914之间,同质性信度在0.746~0.943之间。各维度之间相关在0.378~0.731之间,各维度与问卷总分的相关在0.657~0.852之间,专家评定内容效度较好。结论:自编《基层部队士兵连队归属感问卷》具有比较理想的信度和效度,可以作为测量基层部队士兵连队归属感的有效工具。Objective: To develop the questionnaire of the sense of belonging to company of the soldiers in grass- roots troops and explore the structure of the sense of belonging to company of the soldiers in grass- roots troops. Methods: By annalyzing and sorting the literature and the answer to the questions in the open questionnaire,which included items. Results: Factor analysis indicated that the six factors explained 61. 513% of the variance with loading between 0. 468 ~ 0. 783. Split half reliability was 0. 714 ~0. 914. The internal reliability was 0. 746 ~ 0. 943. The relation among the factors was 0. 378 ~ 0. 731. The relation of factors and the total score was 0. 657 ~ 0. 852. The content validity of expert assessment was good. Conclusion: The questionnaire of the sense of belonging has satisfying validities and reliabilities and can be applied to test the sense of belonging to company of the soldiers in grass- roots troops.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3