检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐汉庆[1] 郑建宇[2] 李克明[1] 李晓华[1] 窦锡彬[1] 卢兰[3]
机构地区:[1]右江民族医学院,百色533000 [2]右江民族医学院附属医院,百色533000 [3]惠州市第四人民医院,惠州516055
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2015年第2期155-157,共3页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
基 金:广西教育厅科研立项项目(201106LX443);右江民族医学院博士引进启动资金课题(yk2012004)
摘 要:目的比较壮医药线点灸联合针挑疗法治疗坐骨神经痛与药物治疗的疗效差异。方法将70例坐骨神经痛患者随机分为治疗组35例和对照组35例。治疗组采用壮医药线点灸足三里,每日点灸1次,每次3壮;同时采用针挑疗法,挑刺阳陵泉、环跳,每天挑刺1次。对照组口服速效坐骨神经痛丸,每日2次,每次2粒。两组均10 d为1个疗程,均连续治疗2个疗程,比较两组患者治疗效果。结果治疗组治疗后疼痛评分降低较明显(P<0.01);治疗组总有效率为88.6%,对照组总有效率为57.1%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论壮医药线点灸联合针挑疗法治疗坐骨神经痛在缓解疼痛症状、提高总有效率方面可能效果更好。Objective To compare the efficacies of medicated thread moxibustion plus needle picking therapy versus medication for sciatica.Method Seventy sciatica patients were randomly allocated to a treatment group of 35 cases and a control group of 35 cases. The treatment group received medicated thread moxibustion on Zusanli (ST36), three cones once daily and needle picking at Yanglingquan (GB34) and Huantiao (GB30), once daily. The control group took quick-acting sciatica pills, two pills twice daily. One course of treatment consisted of 10 days in both groups. The therapeutic effects were compared between the two groups of patients after two consecutive courses of treatment.Result Posttreatment pain score decreased more markedly in the treatment group (P〈0.01). The total efficacy rate was 88.6% in the treatment group and 57.1% in the control group; there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P〈0.05).Conclusion Medicated thread moxibustion plus needle picking therapy for sciatica is more effective in relieving pain and raising the total efficacy rate.
分 类 号:R246.6[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.252.132