检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曾小辉[1]
机构地区:[1]成都大学附属医院放射科,四川成都610081
出 处:《现代临床医学》2015年第1期50-51,54,共3页Journal of Modern Clinical Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨CT、MRI在胫骨平台骨折临床诊断及AO分型中的应用效果。方法:对67例胫骨平台骨折患者临床资料进行回顾性分析。所有患者均给予CT及MRI医学影像检查,之后经外科手术证实为胫骨平台骨折。记录所有患者CT、MRI诊断及AO分型结果,与手术确诊结果进行对比后给予统计学分析并得出结论。结果:CT符合率仅为73.13%,显著低于MRI符合率95.52%(P<0.05);两种方法 C1型、C3型检出率差别较大(P<0.05),其他AO分型CT、MRI检出率对比结果无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:应用MRI检查胫骨平台骨折符合率略高于CT检查,临床医生应准确掌握胫骨平台骨折特征,对疑似病例及时给予医学影像检查,尽快确诊病情并制定针对性的治疗方案,保障患者疗效及预后。Objective: To investigate the CT and MRI application in clinical diagnosis of tibial plateau fractures and AO classification. Methods: 67 cases of tibial plateau fracture were retrospectively analysed. Recorded the CT and MRI reports and AO classification results before the operation,and which were compared with surgical operation results; and there was a statistically analysis. Results: CT correct rate was 73. 13% and was significantly lower than MRI correct rate of 95. 52%( P 0. 05); both methods type C1,C3- type detection rates was difference greatly( P 0. 05),in other AO classification CT with MRI contrast detection rate were not significantly difference( P 0. 05). Conclusion: MRI correct rate of tibial plateau fractures is higher than CT correct rate,the clinician should accurately grasp the characteristics of tibial plateau fractures; for suspected cases,should have imaging examination,diagnosis of the disease is as soon as possible and is targeted efficacy therapy for good prognosis.
分 类 号:R814[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175