我国三大经济圈竞争力研究——兼论京津冀一体化发展对策  

A Study on the Competitiveness of Three Major Economic Circles in China

作　　者：徐光瑞[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国电子信息产业发展研究院工业经济研究所,北京100846

出　　处：《产业经济评论》2015年第1期79-88,共10页Review of Industrial Economics

摘　　要：长期以来,我国三大核心经济圈对经济增长起到了巨大推动作用,然而,随着中心城市要素日趋拥挤,城市病问题逐渐凸显。本文从显性竞争力和隐性竞争力两个方面,对环渤海、长三角和珠三角三大传统经济圈竞争力进行对比分析,并在此基础上结合发展现状对京津冀一体化发展对策进行探讨。结论认为,珠三角地区凭借相对成熟的经济体制处于三大经济圈领先地位,显性竞争力和隐性竞争力均保持较高水平,长三角地区经济竞争力总体处于中等水平,且隐性竞争力与珠三角地区差距微小,而环渤海经济圈受制于区域内各省市发展严重不均衡而位列三大经济圈末位。因此,笔者认为应从强化政策引导、重视合理转移和提高生产效率三个方面加速推进京津冀一体化进程。For a long time, three major economic circles have played a huge role in promoting economic growth. However, with the factors increasingly crowding in urban centers, urban disease continues to appear. The paper gives a comparative analysis on the competitiveness of Bohai, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta from the two aspects of external and internal competitiveness. Combined with the current situation, the paper discusses on the development strategies of the integration of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei. The results show that the competitiveness of the PRD region is the best in three major economic circles by a relatively mature economic system, both external and internal competitiveness maintain a high level. The overal economic competitiveness of the YRD region is at the middle level, and the gap in internal competitiveness with the PRD is tiny. By being subjected to a serious imbalance in the development of the provinces, the competitiveness of Bohai Economic Rim region ranks bottom in the three major economic circles. Based on the results, the paper suggests that, in order to accelerate the integration process of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, China should strengthen policy guidance, pay more attention on the transfer of industry and agency and increasing productivity.

关 键 词：经济圈 竞争力 京津冀一体化 对策 

分 类 号：F124[经济管理—世界经济]