检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邹莹[1] 张佳璐[1] 李雪[1] 刘彤[1] 郑慧玲[1]
机构地区:[1]吉林大学第二医院眼科手术室,长春130000
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2015年第1期14-17,共4页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
摘 要:目的:探讨培训评估圈模式提高眼科手术室在职护士核心能力的效果。方法于2013年6—12月对60名护士运用培训评估圈模式,对培训需求、培训计划、培训实施和培训结果进行评估,并根据评估结果及时修订方案。分别在2011,2012和2013年对手术室护士的专业知识、专业技能、综合应对能力及医生、护士、患者的满意度进行调查。结果2013年手术室护士专业知识、专业技能、综合应对能力得分分别为(84.63±4.69),(83.27±3.79),(88.67±4.66)分,分别高于2011与2012年得分,差异有统计学意义(F值分别为20.24,14.30,32.45;P<0.01)。患者满意度、医生满意度与护士满意度2011和2012年比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),2012和2013年比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论培训评估圈模式用于提高眼科手术室在职护士的核心能力切实可行。Objective To explore the effects of training evaluation cycle mode applied for enhancement of core competence of nurses in Ophthalmic Operating Room .Methods A total of 60 nurses were assessed evaluation of training requirements , training plans , training implementation and training results by using training evaluation cycle mode , and promptly revised scheme based on the assessment results .The investigation had been carried out for nurses′professional knowledge , skills and comprehensive ability , satisfaction of nurses , doctors and patients in 2011 , 2012 and 2013 .Results Professional knowledge and skills , comprehensive response ability gained (84.63 ±4.69),(83.27 ±3.79) and (88.67 ±4.66),which were all statistically higher than those in 2011 and 2012 (F=20.24, 14.30, 32.45;P〈0.01).The satisfactions of nurses, doctors and patients had no statistical difference between 2011 and 2012 (P〉0.05), but had statistical difference between 2012 and 2013 (P〈0.05).Conclusions Training evaluation cycle mode is feasible to improve the core competence of nurses in Ophthalmology Operation Room .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145