新生儿脐部感染原因及护理效果探讨  

Study on the Causes of Neonatal Umbilical Infection and the Effect of Nursing

作　　者：杨赞红 

机构地区：[1]深圳市第七人民医院儿科,广东深圳518081

出　　处：《中外医疗》2014年第18期160-161,共2页China & Foreign Medical Treatment

摘　　要：目的探讨新生儿脐部感染的原因,并且研究不同护理方法对新生儿脐部感染的护理效果。方法选自2012年1月—2013年1月在该院出生的新生儿110例,对新生儿脐部感染的原因进行分析,并且将这110例新生儿随机分成两组,每组55例新生儿,分别命名为观察组和对照组。对对照组55例新生儿采取常规护理的方法,对观察组55例新生儿进行护理干预,观察两组新生儿的临床护理效果。结果对照组55例新生儿进行常规护理,临床感染率为27.3%。观察组55例新生儿进行常规护理基础上,进行护理干预,临床感染率为12.7%。两组新生儿的临床感染率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论通过分析新生儿脐部感染的原因,并且采取有效的护理干预方法,能够减少新生儿脐部感染率,提高护理效果。Objective To investigate the causes of neonatal umbilical infection, and the effect of different ways of nursing on neonatal umbilical infection. Methods 110 neonates born in our hospital from January, 2012 to January, 2013 were selected. The causes of neonatal umbilical infection were analyzed. And the 110 neonates were randomly divided into 2 groups, named as the observation group and the control group, each group of 55 cases of newborns. The 55 cases of neonates in the control group were given conventional nursing, and 55 neonates in the observation group were given nursing intervention. The clinical nursing effect of these two groups of neonates was observed. Results The clinical infection rate of 55 neonates in the control group treated with conventional nursing is 27.3%, and that of the 55 neonates in the observation group treated with nursing intervention on the basis of conventional nursing is 12.7%, the difference between the 2 groups in clinical infection rate is statistically significant（P0.05）.Conclusion Through the analysis of neonatal umbilical infection causes and taking effective nursing intervention methods can reduce the rate of neonatal umbilical infection and improve the effect of nursing.

关 键 词：新生儿脐部感染原因 护理进展 

分 类 号：R473.72[医药卫生—护理学]