社会政策与社区服务历史回顾:关于就地养老研究之国际视野  

Social Policy and Aging in Community: International and Historical Perspectives

作　　者：陈社英 王昕[2] 罗桂芬[3] 

机构地区：[1]佩斯大学 [2]佛山科学技术学院政法学院公共管理学系 [3]中国人民大学劳动人事学院

出　　处：《改革与战略》2015年第2期157-167,共11页Reformation & Strategy

摘　　要：文章采用历史—比较的研究方法,通过扼要回顾国际经验,阐明社区服务与社会政策研究的主要发展脉络,并为有关社区养老的研究与实践,提供一个全面动态的视野。案例包括英国的社区照顾政策、中国的社区服务运动、美国的社会支持研究,以及最近独领风骚的有关"AIP"(就地养老)的提倡。西方福利国家社会政策的症结和中国独特经济国家的经验教训,结合社区养老的专题亦得到分析和总结。美国AIP经验向世界各地扩展的新趋势表明,"银发浪潮"的巨大挑战,为住房及相关产业的进一步开拓提供了重要商机。随着中国社区建设的进一步发展,国际历史经验对于明确社区(家庭)、社会(国家)和市场(产业界)的各自作用与责任有重要借鉴意义。This article provides a comparative view of aging in community by putting related issues in perspective in order to maintain a historical and comprehensive understanding of the changing fields of aging, family, community, and social policy. Going beyond a recent trend of ＂aging in place＂ （AIP）, it reviews community care that once dominated social policy dialog in the United Kingdom, as well as community service that was once regarded as a main solution to the social issues of reformist China. The case of the United States is also highlighted by reviewing a scholarly interest in social support. By citing America＇s ＂non- system＂ of community support for disabled elderly persons, the article recognizes an outstanding： feature of AlP, that is, the ＂buy-in＂ from industry or the commercial sector in terms of its role in promoting aging at home. Other key social policy issues seen in previous debates that baffled policy-makers in various countries, however, remain to be addressed in the much changed environment of the 21 st century.

关 键 词：社区照顾服务/建设 社会支持 就地/居家/在家养老(AIP) 住房改造/装修产业 积极老龄化 公共政策 经济/福利国家与改革 比较-历史分析研究 

分 类 号：F061.4[经济管理—政治经济学]