检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董瑜[1]
机构地区:[1]南开大学世界近现代史研究中心
出 处:《南开学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年第2期148-155,共8页Nankai Journal:Philosophy,Literature and Social Science Edition
基 金:教育部人文社科青年基金项目(12YJC770011);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(NKZXB1437)
摘 要:美国建国初期,一部分政治精英强调,社会精英管理和经营的商业公司能推动社会"共同福祉"。在建立商业公司的具体操作上,要借助社会精英的私人财产,并将商业公司界定为公共机构。在他们眼中,私人财产不仅关系到物质所有和独立人格,而且被赋予了政治属性。然而,更多的人却将私有财产看作追求经济利益的资源,反对赋予私有财产政治属性。在不同财产观念的碰撞中,对私人财产的认知也发生了变化,进而推动了对商业公司界定的转变。In the early republic period of America, some political elites emphasized that the business corporations which was managed by social elites could improve public good. They accumulated private property for the public utilities and defined the business corporations as public institutions. In their eyes, private property not only meant independence, but also had the attributes of politics. However, in the opponents' opinion, private property was the resource of the pursuit of private profit. They refused to endow upon private property political attributes. In the conflict of the views about private property, the change of the view about private property had some impact on the transformation of the definition of business corporations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7